Holger May, “Ballistic Missile Defense: Perspectives on Technology and Policy Issues,” Missile Defense in a New Strategic Environment, ed. Defense Priorities Should Reflect Future Threats,” Financial Times, May 23, 2005.ġ5. O'Hanlon, Defending America: The Case for Limited National Missile Defense (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press, 2001).ġ4. Elaine Bunn, “Deploying Missile Defense: Major Operational Challenges,” Strategic Forum 209 (August 2004): 1–6 James M. Missile Defenses in Europe Will Not Work,” Ethics and International Affairs 22, no. Philip Coyle and Victoria Samson, “Missile Defense Malfunction: Why the Proposed U.S. Security: A Net Assessment (Cambridge, MA: The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, Report, January 2009), 16, (accessed on January 5, 2009).ġ3. Independent Working Group, Missile Defense, the Space Relationship, & the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, MA: The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, 2009 Report, 2008), 26, (accessed on January 5, 2009).ġ2. Anthony Bagnall, “Space as an Enabler in Modern Military Operations,” RUSI Journal 148, no. Robert Kehler, “Space-Enabled Warfare,” RUSI Journal 148, no. Seaboyer and Thranert, “What Missile Proliferation Means,” 85.ĩ. Robin Ranger, David Wieneck, and Jeremy Stocker, Whitehall Pa, 79.Ĩ. William Schneider, “Missile Defense as an Instrument of Non-Proliferation Policy,” in International Missile Defense? Opportunities, Challenges and Implications for Europe, ed. 2 (Summer 2006): 87 Victor Utgoff, “Proliferation, Missile Defense and American Ambitions,” Survival 44, no. Anthony Seaboyer and Oliver Thranert, “What Missile Proliferation Means for Europe,” Survival 48, no. Gormley, “Security Nuclear Obsolescence,” Survival 48, no. Broadly speaking, this conceptualization and the line of reasoning we develop here is similar but not identical to what Raymond Duvall and Jonathan Havercroft present in their “Taking Sovereignty out of This World: Space Weapons and Empire of the Future,” Review of International Studies 34, no. Fakiolas and Tassos Fakiolas, “Pax Americana or Multilateralism? Reflecting on the United States’ Grand Strategic Vision of Hegemony in the Wake of the 11 September Attacks,” Mediterranean Quarterly 18, no. For a background conceptual analysis, see Efstathios T. We take global hegemony to pertain to a global security order in which the distribution of power and the prevalence of certain practices, institutions, and norms enable the hegemon to reproduce its rule and ensure conformity of behavior on the part of the majority of the world's states by a legitimate combination of consent and coercion. For a thorough analysis, see Stephanie Lieggi and Erik Quam, “China's ASAT Test and the Strategic Implications of Beijing's Military Space Policy,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 19, no. Putting it in the words of The Economist, “It is hard to see the test other than as a display of China's ability to challenge American space power.” The Economist, “Stormy Weather: The Test of an Anti-Satellite Weapon Rattles China's Potential Enemies,” The Economist, January 25, 2007. Tries to Interpret Silence Over China Anti-Satellite Test,” International Herald Tribune, January 21, 2007. Although this anti-satellite test by no means demonstrated the Chinese capability to deploy a fully developed space-based missile defense system, it was a sign that China could destroy American spy satellites in low-earth orbit thereby, it reinforced China's status as a military space power. In early January 2007, China launched a ballistic missile and shot down one of its own obsolete weather satellites about 800 km above the earth. Hans Binnendijk (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 2002), 309–30.ģ. Randolph, “Controlling Space,” in Transforming America's Military, ed. For an analogous view put forth from an operational and technological rather than a grand strategic perspective, see Stephen P. However, the EU is still far from being a single, integrated political, economic, and military power.Ģ. For the time being, the European Union may be regarded as the only power that is potentially able to challenge the United States in economic and political terms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |